Talk:SR1

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not /ɛ/

Firstly if we're talking Aussie English, why /ɛ/ instead of /e/? But, that issue aside, what's going on here?

The vowel represented by "ae" in "aesthetic" is not /e/ but /ə/
The vowel represented by "ea" in "early" is not /e/ but /ɜː/
The vowel represented by "oe" in "foetus" is not /e/ but /iː/

JIMp_talk·cont 06:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. They'v been removed. ~Asarlaí 16:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

enuff

While most spelling reforms drop the double letters, the alt spelling is often with them. Thus, enuff is often found and is a good step away from enough. BTW, thoro is another that is alreddy found. --AnWulf ... Wes þu hal! (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

misleading article

A quick internet search reveals this reform was actually never widely used in Australia. http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/33176/australians-and-sr1 Charizardpal (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC) I agree with this statement, an editor has tried to use a partisan English writers' 30 year old statement that the system was widely used in Australia. Apart from this single source, there is no evidence of use beyond perhaps a fringe publications. I have removed the poorly supported statement.Brunswicknic (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]