Talk:Sachin Tendulkar/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 15:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am quick failing this nomination: the article is poorly referenced, as it is completely lacking references in many sections, while in others (such as the lead) is has multiple sources for one minor fact. The references that are there lack consistency, include dead links, and could use completing. The article is badly laid out, with unduly short, and unduly long sections. There are sentences which imply original research ("This might have been the beginning of the "decline" phase in his career.." for example.) I would ask that the nominator please consider the GA criteria before continuing with these time-wasting GA nominations, also exhibited at Talk:Shikhar Dhawan/GA1, Talk:Ravindra Jadeja/GA1 and Talk:Ian Bell/GA1. Harrias ^talk 15:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me what to improve?RRD13 (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean apart from the thoughtful and clearly worded explanation above detailing items that need improvement? Begoon ^talk 14:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My view on the article is that it is missing coverage of his time in England, I think it is a glaring omission not to have some coverage of him being Yorkshire's first non-English player. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]