Talk:Sam and Twitch
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Casefiles Cancelled?
[edit]I can't find a decent source to say that Casefiles was cancelled, but there hasn't been an issue since #25 in 2006. How do we update the artucle to reflect this in a suitably wiki-way?
JonStrines (talk) 10:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Update 3/10/06
[edit]I fixed certain elements. The first series began in 1999 and ended in 2003. The second series Began in 2003 and my understanding is that it is still on going. The original article mentions only the second series as it where the only one, so I fixed it. I dont have access to these issues at the moment, but they do mention as to why there where delays of up to 4 months between issues. I hope to do an update when I have access to them.
Correction 3/29/06
[edit]I was reading and a certain line caught my attention: "Twitch has also battled against many foes that it takes a whole army to defeat he took down Overt-kill in one shot right through the ear A task that Spawn could barely handle and a great feat seeing as he used a pistol to do it." Does that not need to grammatic improvement? I would do it myself but I'm not quite sure what to at certain parts.
6/9/06 Question
[edit]I came to this article looking for information, and the spoiler about Dr. Death being killed really annoyed me. Perhaps this should be left out.
Sam and Max?
[edit]Has anyone else noticed that Samuel and Maximillion could also be read as Sam & Max, does anyone know if this is intentional or just a weird coincidence?
Spawn 154(SPOILERS)
[edit]Sam And Twitch(along with the rest of humanity before the Apocalypse) return after Spawn rebuilds Earth with his new powers. Just Thought you should know. I dont have all the details, I just know they're back. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.106.177.64 (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC).
NPOV
[edit]I think this article needs rebuilding from the ground up. Waaay too much fannish speculation and devotion. It's okay to like the characters but Wikipedia likes a nuetral point of view. Lots42 00:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- By all means! Go for it! Drewcifer 01:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I knew I missed an important detail in my comment; I haven't read the entirety of the series, so I don't want to spoil myself (I only read the sections of article I had already read in comic form). I really hope that made sense. Lots42 16:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The descriptions of the characters' personalities is way too crufty. Nightscream 23:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I knew I missed an important detail in my comment; I haven't read the entirety of the series, so I don't want to spoil myself (I only read the sections of article I had already read in comic form). I really hope that made sense. Lots42 16:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)