Talk:Samir K. Brahmachari

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

India: Education Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Blanking Controversies

I request Geetha Sugumaran not to blank the "Controversies" section in the future.
Samir K. Brahmachari is a somewhat controversial figure, and the Wikipedia article must reflect this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.128.11 (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs repair

I added the {{like resume}} template: most of the article reads like one, not an encyclopedia. And most of it violates WP:V. If one removed all the unverified material, there wouldn't be much left. Barte (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]