Talk:Sangay/GA2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

I'll start this review soon. MathewTownsend (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments (beginning)
  • Why do you have two similarly titles sections, "Geological setting" and "Geology"?
In your previous comments you said that the two needed spinning apart, so I've done so. It's not "Geography" like in Mount Cleveland (Alaska) because unlike Cleveland it's the volcano's geological history that is best understood, not its structure. ResMar 16:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Is there some way you could place the images so that the text is not all pinched between?
I've done my best as it is, the two pictures are in the wrong sections to avoid compression. ResMar 16:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I've done a little copy editing and hope you don't object. Some things just seemed out of sequence. And some sentences were very run on.
  • Cone and crust appear to need disambiguation.
Done. ResMar 16:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

MathewTownsend (talk) 02:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Please forgive me for taking so long; I'm just burned out over Wikipedia. Will try to recoup! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Take your time, with the amount of exams I have going on I ain't going anywhere anytime soon =) ResMar 01:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
    B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources:
    B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:
    B. Remains focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I made a few copyedits which you are free to change.[1]