Talk:Satellite Direct Magazine
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
New page patrol comments
[edit]I would merge. I very much doubt this publication is notable except in the context of DirecTV. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Personally, it seems to me that by leaving the article in place, it could help alleviate potential confusion amongst those who are attempting to unravel the difference between the Satellite Direct magazine and the Satellite Direct software/ con marketing scheme. I created this article here because of the fact that I myself fell in this category at one point and because Wikipedia had no clear answer for this question I wasted $50 on the Satellite Direct marketing scheme. In order to draw attention to my posting here, I've deleted the "delete template" from the article for now. Still I'm not going to make any further objections or template deletions if others seem to continue to feel that this article should be deleted, after having read my reasoning here. Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 01:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm merging this into DirecTV; it's very unlikely this will cause confusion. --GSK ● ✉ ✓ 01:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)