Talk:Science of man

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Books (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

How do I propose a merger? I don't see any reason why this is an article unto itself and "human nature" badly needs a section on this episode In the history of philosophy, as I see it. Kingshowman (talk) 18:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Maybe merge this as a section in the "Human nature" article? I don't think this can carry the weight of a full article.Kingshowman (talk) 05:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Kingshowman

Proposal to merge with Human Nature[edit]

I'm not sure why this is its own article, but I suggest it would be highly useful if placed as a section in "Human Nature." This should be there, and this is not a stand-alone piece in my view. Kingshowman (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Kingshowman