Talk:Scothern

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I HAVE TRIED WITHOUGHT SUCCESS TO REGISTER WITH WICKEPEDIA TO COUNTER RUBBISH PUBLISHED ABOUT THE CHURCH.NO SCONE AS FAR AS I KNOW.NO SAFFRON CONNECTION. PLEASE PROVE ME WRONG! PHILIP MANSER.PARISH ORGANIST AND SACRIST.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.164.248.220 (talk) 20:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed

I removed what I thought was dubious or non-encyclopedic information from the article, however it is being reverted with possibly misleading edit summaries. The section about the church is disputed, as mentioned by 62.164.248.220 (talk · contribs) (Philip Manser) above, and I agree, and think the unverifiable information should be removed. Also the source for the population is not specific enough to verify, and parts of the article are written in inappropriate tone: "highly sought after", and the paragraph about the garden centre. Something such as the "smallest battery hen farm in northern England" also needs a better reference.

One claim that seems particularly unlikely is the place name being derived from "Sconethorne": according to http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=53650 the name was "Scotstorn" of "Scotthorn", and at http://microsites.lincolnshire.gov.uk/upload/public/attachments/793/Dunholme_Nettleham__Scothern_Walk_Leaflet_printable_version.pdf it states that the name is from "from ‘ Scot’s or Scots’ thorn tree’." —Snigbrook 18:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the disputed information, as the user who added it has not replied to this message or added reliable sources. —Snigbrook 18:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a Thought

My birth name was Scothern. After some searching of the origin of my name I found the name originate from Nomandy, the village or town I cannot remember. the family name was originally spelt Scothern. the family males were known as swords for hire, hence the name was changed to to suit the language in England at that time. The Scothern's later-settled on the east coast of England where they remained. The Scothern's also emigrated to the US, and also settled on the east coast of the Us. I emigrated to Australia in 1956 and also settled on the east coast! Until around the 1980's there was no other Scothern's here in Aussie and as far as I know that family, is the only addition to settle here.

The above may be helpful to your research because the name town, Scothern, I believe is named after my original family name.

Robert Albert {Scothern} Porter,—Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.41.76 (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scothern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716072953/http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?03257010 to http://www.lincoln.anglican.org/search_parishes.php?03257010

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]