Talk:Scott of the Antarctic (film)

Antarctica Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Title

As I believe there is only one film of this name surely it should be moved to "Scott of the Antarctic (film)"? Or should it just be moved to "Scott of the Antarctic", which at present redirects to the man himself, Captain Scott? PatGallacher (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved but to Scott of the Antarctic (film). Consensus was to not move as proposed. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott of the Antarctic (1948 film) → Scott of the Antarctic — There is no other film of this name. At present "Scott of the Antarctic" is a redirect to the man himself, Robert Falcon Scott, but most links to it refer to the film. If this is moved it should of course have a hatnote pointing to R.F. Scott. PatGallacher (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose It shuold redirect to the man himself. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 04:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Scott of the Antarctic correctly redirects to the man. The film should be moved to Scott of the Antarctic (film): as there is no other film with that title, the year should not be used as a disambiguator. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Link to Terra Nova expedition

This link exists, but is hidden in the justified but less informative "ill-fated expedition" phrase. May I suggest that one can kill two birds with one stone by rewriting the phrase "ill-fated Terra Nova Expedition", with the proper link punctuation added? Alternatively, one might use the official "British Antarctic Expedition" term. I think either solution does a better job of immediately pinning down which (of many) expeditions the film covers and showing the internal link to the historical event behind the film. Originalylem (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: Done. David Spector (user/talk) 15:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antarctic Footage

In the introduction, it mentions "no actual scenes were made in Antarctica, though some pre-war stock footage from Graham Land may have been used." However, at least two references (ref 4 and 9) cited in this page mention considerable work by cameraman Osmond Borrowdale (well-known at that time), in the Antarctic to film background scenes for 6 months, traveling 30,000 miles. Was none of this footage actually used in the film?

I also found this note, "David James returned to Antarctica in 1946 as the civilian technical advisor for the film Scott of the Antarctic, some of the scenes being shot there from the Newfoundland vessel MV Trepassey." footnote 22 in page 8 here: https://www.cnrs-scrn.org/northern_mariner/vol26/tnm_26_1-20.pdf ~~klossoke