Wikipedia:WikiProject Antarctica/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Antarctica WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Antarctica related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Antarctica}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Antarctica articles by quality and Category:Antarctica articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Antarctica WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Antarctica}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Antarctica|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Antarctica articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Antarctica articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Antarctica articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Antarctica articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Antarctica articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Antarctica articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Antarctica articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Antarctica articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Antarctica articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Antarctica articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Antarctica articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Antarctica articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Antarctica articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Antarctica articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Antarctica articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Antarctica articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Antarctica articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Antarctica articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Antarctica articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Antarctica}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Antarctica| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Antarctica. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Antarctica article, vital for the understanding of Antarctica or extremely notable to people outside of Antarctica. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Antarctica in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High Topics that are very notable within Antarctica, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia. This includes cities with a population of more than 100,000
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Antarctica without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally, including smaller towns
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Antarctica

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

The Siple Island article says the name is actually Richard Island. Which is correct? Mdw0 (talk) 12:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)



Assessment log

Antarctica articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
Note: the logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

September 29, 2016

Reassessed

September 28, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

September 27, 2016

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

September 26, 2016

Reassessed

September 25, 2016

Reassessed

September 24, 2016

Reassessed

September 23, 2016

Reassessed

September 22, 2016

Reassessed

September 21, 2016

Reassessed

September 20, 2016

Reassessed

September 19, 2016

Reassessed

September 18, 2016

Reassessed

September 17, 2016

Reassessed

September 16, 2016

Reassessed

September 14, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 13, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 12, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 11, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Nel Law (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 10, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 9, 2016

Reassessed

September 8, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 7, 2016

Reassessed

September 6, 2016

Reassessed

Removed

  • Burcu Özsoy (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 5, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Burcu Özsoy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 4, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

September 3, 2016

Reassessed

September 2, 2016

Reassessed

September 1, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

August 30, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

August 29, 2016

Reassessed

August 28, 2016

Reassessed

Removed

  • Kingena (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 27, 2016

Reassessed

August 26, 2016

Reassessed

Removed

  • Micraster (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 25, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

August 24, 2016

Reassessed

August 23, 2016

Reassessed

August 22, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

August 21, 2016

Reassessed

August 19, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Edith Farkas (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

August 18, 2016

Reassessed

Removed

  • Jet Thunder (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 17, 2016

Reassessed

August 16, 2016

Reassessed

August 15, 2016

Reassessed

August 13, 2016

Reassessed

August 12, 2016

Reassessed

August 11, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

August 10, 2016

Reassessed

August 9, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

August 8, 2016

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

August 6, 2016

Reassessed

August 5, 2016

Reassessed

August 4, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

  • The Altar (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

August 1, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

July 31, 2016

Reassessed

July 29, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

July 28, 2016

Reassessed

  • Ares Cliff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Muller Ice Shelf (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

July 26, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

July 24, 2016

Reassessed

Removed

July 23, 2016

Reassessed

July 22, 2016

Reassessed

July 21, 2016

Reassessed

Assessed

July 20, 2016

Reassessed

July 19, 2016

Reassessed