Talk:Semantic dispute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

  • Support the April proposal of a merge between Semantic discord and Semantic dispute, however suggest that the direction should be towards Semantic discord, on the grounds that discord may or may not relate to dispute, so dispute is a subset of discord (or, arises from it). I agree that the section Semantic discord#Example is unreferenced (despite being tagged) and worth wholesale deletion (given the lack of evidence in support). Klbrain (talk) 14:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merger as proposed: Semantic discord => Semantic dispute, but would support merger in the opposite direction: Semantic dispute => Semantic discord. Both articles have existed in neglected state for a long time, but dispute seems worse, and recognizes discord article in See also. -- Yae4 (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the proposal to merge in the other direction (for the resasons given). Given the abscence of any objections for this alternative,   checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]