Talk:Seoul City Hall

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

>>>Curvaceousness?!

"Major keywords for designing the new building are traditions, citizens, future. I analysed low-rise horizontal elements, curvaceousness, and shades of leaves in our traditional architectural characteristics, and I applied these to the design so I can recall comfortable feelings of old things."

So we are told in the article. It seems clear to me, given the reference, that this is a translation from the original Korean, perhaps done by the user. The use of "curvaceousness" is a bit silly, as this word generally describes a woman's feminine curves (and in a few cases, other things that suggest distinctly feminine curves). This is surely a mistranslation. If I'm wrong and it is an official translation from the original Korean, perhaps that should be noted with a "[sic]".

I would also quibble over the use of "keywords". This is a computer term, and I think that "key words", with a space, would be better here.

As for "curvaceousness", I would suggest that "curvilinearity" would be better for architecture and other technical endeavours. Kelisi (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]