Talk:Serbian Patriarchate of Peć

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbian Patriarchate of Peć article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Serbia

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Eastern Orthodoxy High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

What about Moldovans and possible Ungrovlachia?

I know that the Patriarch of Pec was - sorry - the boss of the Metropolis of Moldova (or Moldavia), because in 1455 Ioachim, Metropolitan of Moldova was simply deposed by Patriarch Nikodim II of Pec, who designated another metropolitan named Teoctist. Ioachim, or Yoakim flew to Poland. So, why there is no word about the supremacy of the Serbian Patriarch over nowadays Romanians, named Vlachs at that time? Mazarin07 (talk) 23:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]