Talk:Seven management and planning tools

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Duplicate[edit]

This is a duplicate of Seven management and planning tools.

I'm new to editing on Wikipedia and capatilized the title of this article. It prevents the search 'seven management and planning tools' from working.

I've recommended that this article be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jdtoellner (talk • contribs) .

I've fixed this by making "Seven management and planning tools" redirect to Seven Management and Planning Tools. This means that if anyone goes to the Seven management and planning tools article (say by searching for "seven management and planning tools") they will instead end up at Seven Management and Planning Tools. Anyone can create a redirect, in this case I edited the page to contain #REDIRECT [[Seven Management and Planning Tools]]. Best, Gwernol 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caps and lack of italicisation don't add up[edit]

The title is either a widely accepted concept or strategy (article name should be downcased), or it's the title of a website or a book (article name should be italicised). It can't be both, or if it is, it would be more normal to downcase unless someone "owns" them. Can someone say which, please? Tony (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's neither. It's actually an echo of what appears in textbooks on the subject of quality control/quality assurance/quality management—see [1], [2], [3], [4], for example. (This capitalization is admittedly not universal.) It's as if the authors regard it as a proper noun ("Not just any seven. THE Seven!") -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]