Talk:Shalmaneser IV/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 03:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 03:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Okay, all done! Nice little article, I'm happy to pass as GA. I have two minor comments on the references below but this definitely means the criteria. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

@Cerebellum: Thank you for reviewing! I've amended the article per the two comments. Ichthyovenator (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Criteria

• Prose: Article is well written and complies with the MOS.
• References: Article is thoroughly referenced to high-quality modern sources. There are two occurrences of citation #1 in the lead, I think just one after the parentheses would suffice. Spotchecked refs #1 and #s 9-12. For ref #9, did you mean page 155? On that page in the PDF I see, “Belonging to Hama, queen of Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, daughter-in-law of Adad-nerari," I didn't see the info on page 158.

Yes, looking over it again I messed up the page number here. Ichthyovenator (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

• Coverage: Yes, article seems to cover what is known about this king's reign in an appropriate level of detail, you didn't add extra background info just to pad the article length.
• Neutral: Yes.
• Stable: Yes.
• Illustrated: Yes, the image is appropriately tagged and captioned. --Cerebellum (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)