Talk:Shia LaBeouf (song)

Reference ideas for Shia LaBeouf (song)

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Bradley, Bill (2014-10-21). "Rob Cantor's 'Shia LaBeouf' Live Could Even Make The Actor Famous Again". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 2019-09-20. Retrieved 2024-01-11. Shia LaBeouf Just Became Famous Again
Payne, Chris (2014-10-23). "Watch Shia LaBeouf Applaud Cannibalism in Rob Cantor Video". Billboard. ISSN 0006-2510. Archived from the original on 2023-12-17. Retrieved 2024-01-11. Back in 2012, singer-songwriter Rob Cantor wrote a song called 'Shia LaBeouf' about the titular character as a cannibal, with lines like, 'Hollywood superstar… living in the woods/killing for sport.'…
Knoblauch, Max (2014-10-24). "Here's a Weird Song About Shia LaBeouf Being a Cannibal". Mashable. Archived from the original on 2024-01-11. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
Worland, Justin (2014-10-24). "Shia LaBeouf Doesn't Mind Being Called a Cannibal". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. OCLC 1311479. Archived from the original on 2023-12-15. Retrieved 2024-01-11.
Renée, V (2015-01-27). "Turning Shia LaBeouf into an Actual Cannibal: Behind the Scenes of the Viral Music Video". No Film School. Archived from the original on 2021-11-30. Retrieved 2024-01-11. With almost 11 million views on YouTube, the music video for Rob Cantor's 'Shia LaBeouf Live' is clearly a viral success.
Watts, Marina (2020-08-11). "Shia LaBeouf's COVID Test Reaction Is Nothing When You Know About His Other Wacky Viral Moments". Newsweek. ISSN 0028-9604. OCLC 818916146. Archived from the original on 2021-02-06. Retrieved 2024-01-11.

views on youtube[edit]

In October 2019, Salon found that 63.8 million views in five years warranted mention, saying, "A person can watch it dozens of times and still notice something new; that may be why it has nearly 63.8 million views". Their notice and interpretation of the view count has weight. Simple enumeration of that number, two years later, by editors of Wikipedia, has no weight or context, is a primary source, and is original research. Maestro616 (talk · contribs) has replaced the prose twice (only once replacing the Salon source), and for these reasons, I'm inclined to replace the original Salon citation, but would first like to hear whether there're other manuals of style, guidelines, or policies of which I'm unaware that might apply. Thanks, all. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete edit summary[edit]

My apologies for this incomplete edit summary. I was trying to say that my reversion of this addition of claims neither present nor cited in the body of the article was IAW WP:V. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]