Talk:Shin-Yeoseong

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

peer review responses[edit]

To Conceptcontext:

Thank you for your valuable feedbacks! Somethings I will fix are:

-adding images

-double check my neutrality and tones especially in my content background section

-have a Lead section

-instead of citations at the end, I will move them to each sentences to make it more clear where I got each evidence from

-pay attention to past and present tenses

-adding information on how Shin-Yeoseong was critiqued or created critiques

To Morwenna782:

You said my content is neutral and informative but the other user said it seems biased and persuasive, so I will have to get another opinion on that and actively keep that in mind. Thank you for your comments.

Somethings I will add/keep in mind while editing:

-have a brief description of what the article will be about in the introduction/lead section

-improve: [In the Content Background section, in the sentence starting with "The Japanese government systematically..." the wording, "...this idea in the official women's idea after..." on confusing. I don't really understand what you mean.] so I know for sure readers can understand them.

-italicize title of the magazine

-correct typo

-add images

KoreanArtHistory.. (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)KoreanArtHistory.. (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]