Talk:Shvernik Commission

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing names

Z. Serdyuk == ? Сердюк Зиновий Тимофеевич, С 1961 1-й зам. председатель Комитета партийного контроля при ЦК КПСС,
N. Mironov == ? Миронов Миронов Николай Романович Зав. отделом административных органов ЦК КПСС

How did a comission from 61-63 result in the 56 speech.... i think maybe we're a decade out here

I agree, and I removed the dubious fragment. --Dmitri Lytov 06:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but can the dates of 1961 and 63 couldt been wrong? and be, for example 1954-56? Rakela 16:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]