Talk:Shyam Swarup Agarwal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 11:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• I propose reviewing this article which has been waiting for review for seven months. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks Mate, will wait for your comments --jojo@nthony (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

First reading

• "His undergraduate studies ..." - This sentence is too long and needs splitting up.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• "He superannuated" - This is not an expression I know but presumably means that he retired.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• "He died on 2 December 2013" - Can you clarify that you are talking about the father here and not the son.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• "... and as well as ..." - I don't think this "and" is wanted. sentence corrected --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• Panax ginseng needs to be in italics in the caption and the main text.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• "he became the founder head of the Medical Genetics and Clinical Immunology." - The head of what? An institute, a department, a course or what? corrected --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
• Wikilink or explain technical terms like seroepidemiology, phytopharmaceutical.  Done --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  • That's all for the time being. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
    • User:Cwmhiraeth, corrections done as per comments --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

GA criteria

I am happy with the improvements made in response to my comments.

• The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose, grammar, structure and layout.
• The article uses many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.
• The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
• The article is neutral.
• The article is stable.
• The images are relevant and have suitable captions, and are either in the public domain or properly licensed.

• Final assessment - I believe this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)