Talk:Skibidi Toilet/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 17:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
brr skibidi dop dop dop yes yes Skyshiftertalk 17:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
|
General comments
[edit]- Image has a valid fair use rationale
- No copyvio, but you could paraphrase that Cartoon Brew quote to make the percentage lower.
- Done
Infobox and lead
[edit]- None of the Genres in the infobox are referenced; add references or remove
- Done
- Unbold DaFuq!?Boom! as only the title should be in bold
- Done
- The [1] source after DaFuq!?Boom! is unnecessary; easily verifiable information that is already in other sections.
- Done
Plot and characteristics
[edit]- Change "G-man" to "G-Man"
- Done
Background and production
[edit]- Remove all bolded text
- Doesn't it fall under MOS:BOLDREDIRECT?
- Some assets are taken from video games [...] Would move this sentence right after [...] primarily using video game assets. later on, which fits better.
- Done also I removed
primarily using video game assets.
since it was unsupported by the cited source
- Done also I removed
- Would join both paragraphs as they are pretty short.
- Bit unsure on this one - The first paragraph is mostly about its creator, and the second is about the series itself, I think it should be kept seperate.
- While they do talk about different themes, they're still very short and I think a merge would be better. It's okay if kept, though.
- Bit unsure on this one - The first paragraph is mostly about its creator, and the second is about the series itself, I think it should be kept seperate.
Reception and influence
[edit]- Due to the sections' size, I'd recommend separating it into subsections, likely one for critical reception and one for popularity. For example, I think the 3rd and 6th sections could be their own Critical reception section.
- Done
Other + spotcheck
[edit]"Hardware-headed" needs to be clarified for a general audience. GMGtalk 03:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done
WHY DID EVERYONE DECIDE TO BE FUNNY RIGHT WHEN I WAS SLEEPING 😭 I JUST SAW THIS Skyshiftertalk 15:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
anyway heres th espotcheck Skyshiftertalk 16:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dodgson, Lindsay (14 October 2023). "'Skibidi Toilet' isn't mindless — it's a 'cultural touchstone' that captures the anarchic spirit of the internet". Business Insider. Retrieved 2 November 2023.
- Result:
- Lorenz, Taylor (2023-12-09). "How a toilet-themed YouTube series became the biggest thing online". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2023-12-17.
- Result:
- Lang, Jamie (3 July 2023). "How The Animation Channel DaFuq!?Boom! Became Youtube's Biggest Hit This Summer". Cartoon Brew. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
- Result: It does says that Dafuqboom is "rough on the edges", not Skibidi Toilet. But I think using Skibidi Toilet works here per context and the meaning is not changed.
✓ Pass
Sticking out your gyat for the rizzler,
You're so skibidi,
You're so fanum tax,
I just wanna be your sigma
Freaking come here,
Give me your Ohio. Skyshiftertalk 01:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)