Talk:Social Science Research Network

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Open Access Low‑importance

Social Science Research Network is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Reliability as source

Since there is no peer review or significant editorial control, I take it that citations to SSRN would not count as citations of a reliable source? --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New comment: This entry about the blog Social Science Research Network appears to have been written by someone associated with the entity being reviewed.. I believe this entry should be considered for deletion.

Questionable Statement

I find the following statement hard to beleive:

 "In economics, and to some degree in law (especially in the field of law and economics), almost all papers    
  are now first published as preprints on SSRN and/or other paper distribution networks such as Research Papers in 
  Economics (RePEc) before being submitted to an academic journal."

I'm an economist and this has definitely not been my experience. I think that someone should either provide a source for this statement (especially the "almost all" part) or remove it. Derek Pyne2 (talk) 22:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Preprints vs. other content

Tom Reller of Elsevier mentions that SSRN contains also papers licensed by publishers such as Wiley. I couldn't find a published source for the statement so I'd rather not add it to the article, but he says they've covered it before. There is a mention of "PJA" in https://www.slideshare.net/BaltimoreNISO/greg-gordon-ssrn-preprints-through-time --Nemo 12:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]