I have reviewed this article. The grammar was good; there were some capitalization errors, especially in section titles, and some cases in which a paragraph/sentence-based list was more appropriate than a bulleted or numbered list.
The content looks a bit brief for this topic; wikification will aid in readers' understanding, but some phases of this process are introduced without any discussion of their ramifications or important considerations. -Paulmnguyen (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
I did some wikification and rewrote the lead section to be more forward, rather than like the slow introduction of a textbook. I still think that the article deserves more "meat on its bones." -Paulmnguyen (talk) 00:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)