Talk:Songtan

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

The copy-edit is needed for tone and style more than grammar, etc. It's in the form of a tourist brochure, much of it giving advice in the second-person. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be noted that, within its limited scope, this article is very accurate.--211.170.85.88 17:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atually how shoud we name this article to? There would be:

--Tedi (talk) 02:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would vote for Songtan, Pyeongtaek. The current one is technically incorrect under the place name convention since Songtan was absorbed into Pyeongtaek in 1996. Songtan-dong is definitely incorrect; there is a Songtan-dong in Pyeongtaek City; it is a fairly modern creation and is quite a long way (8 km by road) southeast of what was the heart of the old Songtan City (namely, Shinjang-dong, Jisan-dong, Songbuk-dong and Sojong-dong).SpanishCastleMagic (talk) 08:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody has put in "Welcome to the western influence in Asia!~" or something to that effect after the part about stores in the area near the American base were bilingual and accepted USD as well as KRW. This was largely irrelevant and useless so I have deleted this sentence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.70.212.100 (talk) 12:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Songtan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]