Talk:Sorcerer (role-playing game)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Role-playing games Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dictionary of Mu

No mention of The Dictionary of Mu? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan L (talk • contribs) 14:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

"Sorcerer" is notable in that the game is frequently mentioned in RPG-theory and game-design discussions these days. Most published pen-and-paper RPG titles have an entry on Wikipedia, including "indie" releases. Within the gaming "subculture", "Sorcerer" is actually one of the most talked about RPGs of the decade. Rafu (talk) 15:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the fact that the game's author writes a LOT about RPG-theory has of course nothing to do with it... One of his articles in even included in the game! 81.67.23.175 (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]