This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Very informative article; one minor point of usage re term 'pillar' in 3rd paragraph: 'column' is the better choice for the interior vertical structure of a concrete, multi-story building.
Also in the third paragraph: in the U.S., the term 'egg crate', when used in reference to concrete construction, has come to be associated with a particular kind of formwork for horizontal slabs, as opposed to a generic term for the concrete structure of a whole edifice. This may reflect a difference in usage between countries or the current usage of egg crate may be a later coinage than the use made by the source referred to in the article. Perhaps some slight modification of the sentence, suggesting the source for the use of the term 'egg crate' in connection to the project would help avoid confusion, e.g.: "... concrete frame or 'egg crate' as it was called in a contemporary professional review". (Srustow (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]