Talk:Stand Up Seoul

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I am still working on it. I'm learning how to use Wikipedia as I go. I'm not affiliated with Stand Up Seoul in any way, by the way, not that I can prove that. There are plenty of articles I will link to. —Hassanator (talk)

You'll need to link not just to articles but to articles providing substantial coverage of the group. —C.Fred (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? Getting closer? —Hassanator (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closer. One of the stories has some coverage of the troupe.[1] —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, all three articles not only mention the group, but go into some detail. Did you read them all? The Kyle Kinane article briefly mentions the comedian, then talks about the group. The James Adomian piece has several paragraphs about the group, and the article about the 3rd anniversary of the group is, well, all about the group. I'm going to bed, because it's 2:32am here, so don't delete this right away. It'll get longer and gain citations.—Hassanator (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the request for speedy deletion; that should keep the page around for at least a week: if it were brought up for "normal" deletion, discussion would last at least a week. —C.Fred (talk) 17:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]