Talk:Still Alice/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ribbet32 (talk · contribs) 00:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
1a Flows well;
what is this ",;" in the plot? Otherwise good to go
1b
needs some organizational tweaks. Critical and accolades should be subsections of an overarching "reception". Would like a brief, brief mention of the Sony hack in the lede too, since it's an important part of the release with its own subsection. Otherwise good to go
-
2a
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
-
3a.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
Accolades section overlooks the fact that it was Moore's first Oscar [1] and that she was the frontrunner [2] while missing the critical dispute over its worthiness [3] [4], which could be balanced out by the praise in The Guardian and a reminder of the Rotten Tomatoes consensus
5. No horrific edit wars (The horror, the horror...)
Moore image is free, poster is attributed
- @Ribbet32: Thanks for the helpful review, and sorry it took me a few days to respond. I think I've addressed all of your comments – thanks for the suggestion to elaborate on Moore's Oscar win, because I think it was worth noting. Let me know if you think anything else needs to be changed. 97198 (talk) 09:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you @97198:; sorry, just noticed this in lede: "Moore's performance, who won numerous awards"- a performance is not a "who". Ribbet32 (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- And there's no ref on the Women's Image Network Awards. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Ribbet32: Good eye. I've adjusted the wording and removed that award from the table because I couldn't find any reference for it apart from IMDb. 97198 (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Done @97198: Thank you, listed. Ribbet32 (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Ribbet32: Good eye. I've adjusted the wording and removed that award from the table because I couldn't find any reference for it apart from IMDb. 97198 (talk) 11:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- And there's no ref on the Women's Image Network Awards. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you @97198:; sorry, just noticed this in lede: "Moore's performance, who won numerous awards"- a performance is not a "who". Ribbet32 (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)