Jump to content

Talk:Stimson's python

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Subspecies

[edit]

Why does this article say that no subspecies are recognised? There are two officially recognised (in Australia) subspecies (A. s. stimsoni and A. s. orientalis), and these are both listed in the Synonyms section of the taxabox. Has there been a recent publication that nullifies these subspecies? Smacdonald 04:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here at Wikipedia, the taxonomy we follow for all python articles is the one available through the ITIS online database (see reference in article). It is based primarily on McDiarmid et al. (1999) -- the source of the synonymy provided. Regarding A. s. orientalis, the aforementioned checklist follows Barker and Barker (1994), which does not recognize the validity of this subspecies. --Jwinius 13:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why does Wikipedia rely on 10+-year-old publications? - Smacdonald (talk) 03:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Antaresia stimsoni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Antaresia stimsoni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]