Jump to content

Talk:Strand, London/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 20:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Part of its length was known in the 13th century" -do we know which part?
Another source says it was a name of the whole street generally, so I've copyedited this Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link Civil War in first instance, remove in modern times section?
Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the Somserset House paragraph can you reword a few examples of "house", it is repeated quite a lot.
Try that Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Watch rep of "popular" in second paragraph of Modern era
Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • " King's College Hospital opened in 1840, and the college became a constituent college of the University of London in 1908. " -shouldn't the latter part of this follow on from where you mention the college rather than the hospital?
I think the confusion here is where "college" refers to the term generally, and of the formation of an integrated University of London, reworded. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: Can see little wrong with it, will pass once addressed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Doubtless the masses will descend and copyedit it if it hits DYK, but that's not actually a bad thing. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Dr. Blofeld 18:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]