Talk:Studio City, Los Angeles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject California / Los Angeles / Southern California (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Los Angeles task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Southern California task force.
 

Parking and traffic "problems".[edit]

I removed the following statement from the "Geography" section:

"Traffic and parking problems have recently worsened, and the construction of parking structures has not made a visible improvement."

Besides the fact that it has nothing to do with geography,it is incorrect.I live and work in Studio City (last 14 years)and I have NEVER encountered what would reasonably be considered a noteworthy traffic "problem". Parking along Ventura Blvd.can be a little tricky and one might even have to walk a bit but this is no different from many busy areas of that Blvd.Certainly not something worth mention in an encyclopedic context.76.166.245.241 (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Advertisements in the first section[edit]

It looks like someone inserted ads into the intro. These should just be deleted; they're not really important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.107.83 (talk) 14:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree. Go for it! Weedwhacker128 (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Notable Residents[edit]

I'd urge editors to visit WP:LISTPEOPLE before adding a name to Notable Residents. A reliable source is required, and the person must be notable per Wikipedia guidelines. Weedwhacker128 (talk) 16:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Article Evaluation[edit]

It appears the population section of this article is out of date, as it uses 2000 census information when 2010 census information is available. Specific information regarding schools located within the city also seems extraneous for the purposes of this article. Wd1996 (talk) 04:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Good catch. I reverted to original wording by removing unsourced extraneous school info that was added and could be found on the pages for these schools, if there are any. As for the census info, you are correct, but perhaps the Los Angeles Times should be asked to update its Mapping L.A. site. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)