Talk:Sudell's frog
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Trilling frog page were merged into Sudell's frog on 16 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose to merge Trilling frog into Sudell's frog as they are considered synonomous by the Amphibian and Reptiles Project's standard taxonomic reference (Amphibian Species of the World 6.0 (ref here)). While AmphibiaWeb and IUCN Red List both still list Neobatrachus centralis as a separate species, the IUCN entry references an older (2015) version of ASW. Loopy30 (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Canberra articles
- Low-importance Canberra articles
- WikiProject Canberra articles
- C-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- C-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- C-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- C-Class Victoria articles
- Low-importance Victoria articles
- WikiProject Victoria articles
- C-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- C-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles