Talk:Sugar Hill Historic District (Detroit)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Requested move

I request move from "Sugar Hill Historic District" to "Sugar Hill Historic District (Detroit, Michigan)" to make way for disambiguation. There is at least one other Sugar Hill Historic District, in New York City. Someone has somehow prevented the move by protecting the destination name; i didn't know that could be done (how can it be done, by the way?). I have no knowledge of the Michigan one being primary, so expect these two are equal in importance, and then its the right thing to do, to use the un-parenthesesed name for disambiguation of these two and any others. doncram (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NRHP info says the Michigan one was built later (in 1946 while the New York one was built in 1865) and also that it was listed on the NRHP later (2003 vs. 2002). doncram (talk) 01:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An obvious move. I don't think this should be in any way controversial, and suggest it be listed as such at Wikipedia:Requested Moves. Andrew Jameson (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]