Talk:Sukhoi S-70 Okhotnik-B

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

طائرة أوخوتنيك.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

S 70

4 built, and possibly more . 2601:447:CA81:B9B0:2037:4B8A:6155:5610 (talk) 02:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC):[reply]

Ok. We need a reliable source in order to update the article. Do you have one? --McSly (talk) 02:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last paragraph is pure opinion from one "source"

I´m sorry, but the last paragraph is pure speculation, not to mention that it is based entirely on the speculation/opinion of a single "source", repeated over and over again. "Source" who really seems to know little to nothing about aviation technology, and his article seems to have been written from scraps of Wikipedia, seasoned with his biased opinion, including totally erroneous parts and zero evidence, which I will not list. In fact, the only "valid" thing in the entire Forbes article is the ability to better understand the shape of the aircraft, but even this is unnecessary, since there are more than enough videos and photos with useful references to infer all the measurements. Instead of such a "source of opinion", a serious, recognized and above all PROFESSIONAL source SPECIALIZED in aviation technologies should be used, when such a source publishes something about it.. 152.206.189.159 (talk) 03:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 4 types of territory more or less relevant to the downed S-70

Logically, there are 4 types of territory can be be considered in the context of the downed S-70:

1A) Territory that is Ukraine (as per its internationally recognized borders) and that is currently _not_ occupied by Russia.
1B) Territory that is Ukraine (as per its internationally recognized borders) and that is currently occupied by Russia.
2A) Territory that is Russia (as per its internationally recognized borders) and that is currently _not_ occupied by Ukraine.
2B) Territory that is Russia (as per its internationally recognized borders) and that is currently occupied by Ukraine.

1A) is where the downed S-70 crashed.

1B) is only about a dozen km from where the downed S-70 landed and the S-70 flew over 1B)-type territory, so the distinction between 1A) and 1B) is important.

2A) is where the downed S-70 took off from. It is on the border of Kazakhstan, almost 600km from the front and is not at risk of becoming occupied by Ukraine.

2B) is as such not relevant to the downed S-70.

As such, it is not helpful to indicate that the S-70 took off from "Russian-controlled territory".

As for the S-70 crash site, the information that the UAV had crossed the front line should make it self-evident that with a crash site in "Ukraine", the type of territory is 1A), i.e. _not_ occupied by Russia. Trying to very accurately specify 1A) with a formulation like "Ukrainian controlled part of Ukraine" seems overly cumbersome and unnecessary.

Further, describing the crash site as "Ukranian-controlled territory" makes it possible for a reader to mistake it to mean territory of type 2B), i.e. Russian territory currently occupied by Ukraine. So this should be avoided.

Editors are asked to please take this into consideration when attempting to improve on the article. Thanks. Lklundin (talk) 19:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highly questionable source

The source regarding ukraine's supposed analysis of the S70 is highly questionable the article in question claims that Ukraine analysed the S70 and had then made a statement about it but the article is from October the 6th just one day after the S70 was shot down this means that Ukraine would have to have collected the S70's wreckage transported it to a lab run extensive tests Including material analysis, analysis of the S70 components And software and then make a public statement about the aircraft all in the span of the day it is also important to note that the article never names the Ukrainian expert that is quoting nor the Ukrainian department that they works for it is also to note that no other article except ones that directly cite the article in question mentions this statement by Ukraine. The article also claims that Ukraine was able to find out information on the S 70s software which seems hard to believe considering that the aircraft was largely destroyed scattered into several pieces after being hit by both an air to air missile and a ballistic missile and yet somehow Ukraine supposedly collected information from the S 70s computer which must have somehow been intact there's also the statement about the S70 not having any stealth polymers which is a very unusual thing for an expert to say as it implies that all radar absorbing materials are polymers when most of them are not the creators of the article have also discussed in the past the widely debunked claim that a F16 shot down a Su-34 calling into question the creator of the articles credibility because of these reasons I do not believe that the source in question could be considered acceptable by Wikipedia standard. Madnow2 (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]