Talk:Sumter Mall

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 3 June 2014 (UTC), see discussion.
delete, 24 April 2014, see discussion.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... The article is not the same, it was one sentence before and is now expanded and includes 2 non-local sources(The State in Columbia, SC and Herald-Journal in Spartanburg, SC) --Me5000 (talk) 01:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is additional discussion about this speedy deletion nomination at [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... My understanding is that the original (now deleted) article was short and lack any significant sourcing. This one seems to meet WP:N. Assuming that's right, this isn't a speedy case. --Hobit (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]