Talk:Sundar C/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sundar C. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sundar C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081022125226/http://www.screenindia.com:80/old/feb13/south3.htm to http://www.screenindia.com/old/feb13/south3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
My edit
De-regionalized the wording. I respect national varieties of English, but for at least the next few decades we must wait to see where its presumable internationalization leads us.
Prediction is an inherently blunt tool, and for now we can’t know whether English will develop into a more thoroly international role, or (as did Latin, ultimately) into a niche language for several technical fields (say, biology, law, and a theological/ceremonial patois; perhaps, en: will in futuris be an interlingual tool relevent only to content that profits from technical precision). ‘Twere just, if it should take over Latin’s role as a standard for lack non-ambiguity, and, perhaps, for catholicity (in a non-theological sense).
—2601:199:C201:FD70:B4D7:CBA4:72C4:1820 (talk) (ex-admin Jerzy, ex-JerzyA), 00:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)