Talk:Symantec Online Backup
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Symantec Online Backup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Wrote initial draft of this today. Did my best to make sure it wasn't a marketing oriented article. Your feedback welcome on ways to improve this if necessary. --Richard goodwin (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- This is a big improvement from the version I originally tagged as an advert. Toddst1 (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Todd it's now flagged as conflict of interest. I'm not sure I see a way to create the topic without being considered as such. Looking at some other similar entries, I thought by registering my main work mail it was actually being MORE legitimate rather than less. The service does exist, it is being referenced in online media, and is tied to Symantec, so it seemed fine to me. Thanks for your guidance.--Richard goodwin (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Still sounded too much like an advert gave it another (minor) rewrite and added some new links. Hope it reads ok. Jaqian (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Todd it's now flagged as conflict of interest. I'm not sure I see a way to create the topic without being considered as such. Looking at some other similar entries, I thought by registering my main work mail it was actually being MORE legitimate rather than less. The service does exist, it is being referenced in online media, and is tied to Symantec, so it seemed fine to me. Thanks for your guidance.--Richard goodwin (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)