Talk:TV Buddha
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
3 new sources to contribute to page
[edit]Source 1: https://vmfa.museum/mlit/looking-buddha-watching-tv/
Source 3(peer-reviewed article): https://link-springer-com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/article/10.1007/s11712-018-9643-5 Jh021 (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
3 new sources to contribute to page (Chicago style citation) - Edited version of other topic
[edit]Source 1: Lee, Ryan. "The Buddha on TV: Nam June Paik's fraught relationship to Buddhism." PBS. Last modified May 10, 2023. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/the-buddha-on-tv-nam-june-paiks-fraught-relationship-to-buddhism/27482/.
Source 2: "Looking at Buddha Watching TV." VMFA. https://vmfa.museum/mlit/looking-buddha-watching-tv/.
Source 3(peer-reviewed article): Lim, Tae-seung. "Moving Meditation: PAIK Nam June's TV Buddha and Its Zen Buddhist Aesthetic Meaning." Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, January 12, 2019. https://link-springer-com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/article/10.1007/s11712-018-9643-5
Article Initial Outline
[edit]General description:
It would discuss the first production of Paik Nam June’s TV Buddha and its general description of how the Buddha statue is staring at the TV, then transitioning into the 1976 product as it is the oldest version that is displayed in a Western setting, which fits in with Paik’s intentions of merging the Western and progressive technological world with such a prominent Asian figure.
Collections:
Although I would specifically focus on the 1976 version to better visually analyze the distinct features that underlie more prominent messages, in my final outline, the collections part of the Wikipedia page would not be removed as the reproducibility and simplicity of TV Buddha conveys its symbolic combination of spirituality and technology is applicable to a wide audience, making it more fitting of a masterpiece.
Paik Nam June’s Background:
Paik Nam June’s background in relation to Buddhism within the Japanese-occupied Korea of the World War 2 era is extremely salient to understanding the artwork, as his cold-eyed awareness of the world around him allowed Paik to bring the Buddha down to Earth.
Visual features:
Here, I would use sources I have already outlined on the talk page, including PBS’s article discussing reflection of the Buddha on the TV screen for the audience to face their suffering within the immovable force of technology within our modern society and Lim Tae Sung’s peer-reviewed article talking about the how the Buddha statue and TV screen are placed equally on the same platform for the “completion of modernity” Jh021 (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
References:
Lee, Ryan. "The Buddha on TV: Nam June Paik's fraught relationship to Buddhism." PBS. Last modified May 10, 2023. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/the-buddha-on-tv-nam-june-paiks-fraught-relationship-to-buddhism/27482/.
Lim, Tae-seung. "Moving Meditation: PAIK Nam June's TV Buddha and Its Zen Buddhist Aesthetic Meaning." Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, January 12, 2019. https://link-springer-com.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/article/10.1007/s11712-018-9643-5
"Looking at Buddha Watching TV." VMFA. https://vmfa.museum/mlit/looking-buddha-watching-tv/.
Adding more to collections: Modifying what is already there
[edit]New proposed collections:
The work was first purchased for a museum collection in 1977 by the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam. Paik produced successive versions of the work. A 1976 version of the work is in the collection of the Art Gallery of New South Wales, Australia. A 2004 version is held by the Fogg museum at Harvard University.
The numerous renditions of TV Buddha perfectly encapsulate the simplicity and reproducibility of this video art, as the combination of Western technology and east Asian culture is prevalent throughout this globalized contemporary society. Within this variety, the 1976 version holds immense salience, as it being the oldest adaptation located in a Western setting best captures Paik’s revolutionary intentions to present the Zen-Buddhist concept of “movement and stillness” to a Western audience. [1]. Thus, this piece will become the foundation of this Wikipedia page. Jh021 (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposing new section: Paik's background
[edit]As Paik's background plays an integral role of his decision-making behind TV Buddha, his upbringing would be significant to understand the video art.
Proposed Paik's Background section:
Having been born into a Buddhist family in 1932, Paik had a fraught relationship with Buddhism, always believing the religion was backwards and fatalistic. This critical perspective only intensified with the Japanese occupation, as Paik saw how Buddhists could be corrupted by political ideology. Growing in Japanese-occupied Korea, Paik was forbidden from speaking his own language, with Japanese Zen monks playing a “leading role in war propaganda”. This cold-eyed awareness allowed Paik to bring down Buddha to Earth, as if Buddhism was to have any relevance of electronic superhighway, it would not be able to float within a glorified detached. Thus, to Paik, Buddha would have to “engage the screen, the video camera and the rapid flow of information and image – the material realities of the day”realm.
Not only this, this Korean War forced Paik's family to flee to Hong Kong and eventually in University of Tokyo in 1956, where he would graduate with a degree in aesthetics[2]. His continued aesthetic studies at West Germany was the focal point of his career, as meeting American avant-garde composer John Cage and his inventive compositions and unorthodox ideas influenced Paik's entry into unique video and installation art [3]. Jh021 (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposing new section: Visual description and meaning
[edit]As the visual characteristics and the meaning behind the art are significant, a section dedicated to this would be extremely salient.
Proposed Visual Description Section:
This 1976 version, like all other renditions, is an installation art with a television monitor, video camera, painted wooden Buddha, tripod, and plinth. The Buddha's dimensions are 75 x 36cm x 36cm whilst the TV monitor is relatively smaller at 32 x 32 x 32cm. The Buddha statue is an old wooden Maitreya (Buddha of the future) from the John Kaldor, an Australian philanthropist, collection[4]https://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/collection/works/342.2011.a-f/#about]. In essence, as the Buddha stares into the spherical TV screen, the camera records this, looping it back to the monitor in real time as if the Buddha watches a mirror.
Other key features exemplify the meaning behind the piece. Paik rewires the television so that a single white line bisects a dark screen, resulting in a non-static image as the light from the cathode ray tubes are constantly in motion. Paik’s revolution was to break the sanctity of the screen as the screen conveys the one-way communication of the broadcast. As Paik believed television is a dictatorial medium where we simply sit and watch under its authority, he tried to establish what a democracy means; an equal platform for all[5]. Like how every child who discovers a magic of dragging a magnet across a TV screen and thus alters a seemingly immovable force, Paik devotes his work towards breaking the control of imprisoning technology. The mound on which the Buddha rests on remains as another important factor of TV Buddha, as it is very similar to a stupa, which along with the Buddha itself, is one of the most important visual forms in Buddhism. As a grave mound, the stupa symbolizes the complete release from seemingly endless round of births and deaths, because when Buddha, a fully enlightened being dies, he will never be born again. This reaching of an ultimate and transcendent state ties back to the importance of stillness, as the Buddha is liberated from technological manipulation through continuous contemplation of oneself[6]. This feature extends further, as Paik Nam June’s foundation signifies the appearance of the audience when leaning towards the screen to watch what the Buddha sees as the most prominent aspect of the installation art. By looking at their own appearance, the audience gets a glimpse of their digital existence. This mirrored reflection represents humanity’s complete immersion with the digital world, as an individual’s online version has become integral to one’s identity[7]. Jh021 (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Proposing new section: Scholarship
[edit]Proposed Scholarship section:
Critics realize Paik’s influence on the artistic community through his work with video media, as they credit Paik with recognizing TV’s pervasiveness in which it makes it almost invisible; “he sought to create alternatives to TV’s capacity to lull, to entertain and to make passive consumers of its audience”[8]https://vmfa.museum/mlit/looking-buddha-watching-tv/]. By challenging television’s power, Paik transformed video image into a way of redefining restrictions of sculpture and installation art. Especially as a "prophet" of the digital age as well as the founder of the term electronic superhighway, Paik's recognition corrosive possibilities of technology on our sense of self, community, and faith inspired resistance to mass media as undirectional, hoping citizens of the digital age to take back some control. [9]https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/how-nam-june-paiks-past-shaped-his-visions-of-the-future]
Even regarding Buddhism, Paik is praised, especially in relation to one of the religion’s core questions on how to face the suffering of the world. Critics describe Paik seeming to live with that question every moment, as experimentation was his art; his relentless, optimistic quest to expand the limits and definition of communication were his answer to suffering. Particularly by forcing Buddha to be trapped in a closed-circuit loop of his own reflection on a TV screen, Paik questions modern vanity and society’s self-absorption driven by mass culture and technology, encouraging everyone to find more individuality in this robotic reality[10]. Jh021 (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)