Talk:Taipei Times

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Taipei Times be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Taiwan may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

A google search for the terms "edward strong" and "taipei times" turns up absolutely nothing. I've removed the sentence. Wl219 17:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted circulation figures for this newspaper and its competitors (The Taiwan News & The China Post) are all quite implausible. Nor is the period specified. These papers don't appear to have any independent circulation auditing, but self report vague and unverifiable figures from time to time. Requesting citations for all of them now. If there's no independent source for these figures, they really should be removed soon. 118.166.78.162 (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the details in this article are irrelevant. Publishing articles from the Guardian is not noteworthy, nor is having a link to Wikipedia feature on the website. Davidreid (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]