This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

UKAirports template

I removed the UKAirports box (again) because the template is really meant for airports rather than airfields. There has been a discussion about this on the talk page - Template_talk:UKAirports. Feel free to add to that discussion if you think I am wrong. --Cheesy Mike 12:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Position

Having recently flown into Tattenhill, the position given by Pooley's Flight Guide stuck in my mind - 5 nm west of Burton. Checked, and yes, I was right, so I altered it. However, subsequently checking with the AIP and measuring on the aviation chart shows 4nm to be right, so I have reverted. Emeraude 14:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airfield Elevation

This has recently been revised in the AIP from 450 feet to 439 and so I've modified this item. The nearest whole number of metres is now 133

Jovial John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.189.116 (talk) 10:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]