Talk:Tax shield

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Usage

Is it appropriate word usage to describe a tax write-off as a "tax shield"? Aaronchall (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inappropriate signage

Tax shield edited and described as interest on debt x tax rate chen

incomplete sentence

in this paragaraph we dont think so that is l —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.96.220 (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tax shields simply do NOT exist

business values result from a comparison with a peer: consequently, if taxation of the FCF / interest is equal to its peer, tax burden (FCF) and tax savings (interest expense) cannot create any value: e.g. in case A, value of FCF is 100 : 10% (before tax) = 80 : 8% (after tax) = 1.000 each. in case B, provided that the business valued as well as its peer both have deductible interest, value of debt must be 4.000 (320 : 8% = 256 : 6%)with equity value being 5.000 less 4.000 = 1.000 (instead of 1.800)and levered equity cost = 14,4% (144 / 1.000) instead of 8% (144 / 1.800). Kai udo pawelzik (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Udo Pawelzik, Simplification of business valuation without Tax shields, CorporateFinance biz, 2013, page 261