Talk:TeXnicCenter

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Untitled

Anyone know how to the reopening the file after a recompilation at the same location as it was just before for a acrobat reader? Thanks.

This should be discussed in more details, since, as the article suggests, the TeXnic is centric about Acrobat Automation. --Javalenok 00:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found the following additional DDE message very useful to suppress display of the bookmarks menu when your pdf contains them: [DocSetViewMode("%bm.pdf","PDUseNone")]. When others confirm this it could be added to the main page. --130.161.247.95 09:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC) (Stefan)[reply]

Acrobat integration

I just edited this article adding instructions on how to integrate Acrobat Reader with TeXnicCenter. Soon after I realized somebody has deleted some previous similar text, stating that Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. However, the German version of this article does include instructions - in special, a not so straightforward workaround to a problem with Acrobat v8.0. I strongly believe this information probably is of interest to anyone setting up TeXnicCenter (as it was for me), even if the bug is eventually fixed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ftrebien (talk • contribs) 2007-06-10 23:02 (UTC).

Just because the German version of Wikipedia does it, doesn't mean that we have to. I'm not familiar with the German Wikipedia—it may be that they have different policies on including how-tos and so on, or it may be that nobody has decided to enforce that policy on the German article. If it's not straightforward to integrate Acrobat with TeXnicCentre, it may be worth noting that fact, stating a workaround exists, and citing that workaround as a source. Then that workaround is easily available for readers of the article, but the article itself doesn't incude it. However, as I stated when originally removing the text, Wikipedia is not an instruction manual.

I won't revert your edits immediately—I'll wait for your comments first, in the hope of avoiding an edit-war. However, I do believe that the content you have added does not belong in Wikipedia, and may be better at, say, b:LaTeX.

me_and 12:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the page to reflect the changes you proposed.

I'm still new to Wikipedia policies. It's ok with me if you think it's best to simply cite the issue and provide a reference to the workaround, or maybe relocate it to Wikibooks, as long as the information is reachable to the reader.

Ftrebien 17:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"...The same instructions apply to Adobe Acrobat Reader/Professional 8.0.0, but the DDE calls have to be modified as proposed in [2] because of a bug in this version of Acrobat." The link [2] seems to be dead and I cannot find the original information anywhere, just many references to this now-dead link. Could anyone who has that information please copy it or provide a working link? 22:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.1.48.173 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on TeXnicCenter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]