Talk:Tektology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletions[edit]

The reference to "This is (historically) the first identification of philosophical "complexes" in the natural sciences to denote a combination of elements of `activity - resistance'." was deleted as unsupported by evidence and contradicted by evidence. Contradictions include:

  • Čarnogurská, M. (2007). Chinese philosophy through a prism of its classical ontological conception in the future global context. In The proceedings of the twenty-first world congress of philosophy (Vol. 7, pp. 157-160).
  • and the work of Aristotle, cf Aristotle's on the Soul: And on Memory and Recollection. (2004). Aristotle's on the soul: And on memory and recollection. Green Lion Press. (Original work published 2001), see Introduction by Joe Sachs.

There may be a more precise way in which this is a first, but if so this needs clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maven111 (talkcontribs) 14:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

As the book Tektology uses a spelling with a K, should not this page be spelt the same way? Leutha (talk) 08:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]