Talk:Telugu-Kannada alphabet

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Between 1100 CE - 1400 CE, The Kannada script and Telugu script separated from Old-Kannada script (Halegannada script).

Satavahana or Bhattiprolu script was not used to write Telugu language

Moving this page from 'Telugu-Kannada alphabet' to 'Kannada-Telugu alphabet' to bring it into a correct form, Satavahanas didn't used Telugu language in their administration and also didn't used their variety of Brahmi script to write Telugu language, the Old Kannada script was followed by the Kannada rulers of Chalukyas of Vemulavada and Vengi in modern Telugu states in which the rulers who recognized Telugu language used to issue inscriptions in Kannada, Telugu and Sanskrit in which the script used by them was the Old Kannada or Kannada script which brings the form that that involvement of Telugu language in an inscription which is written in Kannada script to bring the form as Kannada-Telugu script or alphabet

"Similarly in the literary sphere, these Chalukya rulers were responsible for ushering in the Kannada and Telugu literatures. It was their patronage that enriched not only Kannada and Telugu literatures but also of Sanskrit with valuable treatises and Kavyas. In fact, though these families held a minor status in the political life of Andhra, they held a glorious position as patrons of literature and enriched it on a massive scale"

- History Of The Minor Chalukya Families In Medieval Andhradesa, Kolluru Srinivas [1]https://archive.org/details/history-of-the-minor-chalukya-families-in-medieval-andhradesa/page/n655/mode/2up CatTheMeow (talk) 04:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop disruptive edits

@Glennznl please take action against User @Reo kwon, this user is included in disruptive edits even after many revisions summerized to him, the user is just 'emotionally attachted to his language' and involved in Wiki vandalism continuosly

Kannada had the dominant class over Telugu during the period of Chalukyas of Vengi and Vemulavada, the rulers and scholars of these dynasties used the same script (Old Kannada script) to write Kannada, Telugu, Sanskrit and other languages, these dynasties descend from Early Chalukyas of Karnataka i.e. Kannada country and influenced Kannada as far of Eastern and Western Deccan, most of the noted Kannada poets were from their court, Kannada-Telugu script was developed during their period 2406:7400:63:EE40:DCB1:2A81:9A1B:9C92 (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into it, and multiple users seem to be involved in the same edit war. The term "Telugu-Kannada" has 2530 results on Google Scholar while "Kannada-Telugu" has 1800. On Wikipedia we picked Telugu-Kannada and this should be the end of the discussion. Arguing about the order of the name is a waste of time. I will try to get extra protection for the page to calm the edit war down. --Glennznl (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your last revision includes lots of propaganda please take it to some another revision CatTheMeow (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CatTheMeow: Can you point out some examples of propaganda? --Glennznl (talk) 09:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The History one CatTheMeow (talk) 17:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 August 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The latest revision is based on regional chauvinism especially in the History title 2406:7400:63:778A:A825:156D:E9A7:9D02 (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Recoil16 (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

@C.Fred Please check the disruptive edits by @CatTheMeow on this page. He provides no sources for backing up his edits. Reo kwon (talk) 10:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @C.Fred the user @Reo kwon don't provide any reliable source to consider his edit to be true, he is involved in continuous disputive war even after providing plently of sources and plays victim card after he's offended because his edit war was reverted CatTheMeow (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]