Jump to content

Talk:The Caravan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

1. The copy pasted material is from the magazine website (under the column About us and in History of the Caravan). The material is open to the general public.

2. The tone of the article is only descriptive and not neutral.

Miss remiss (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Caravan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Controversies' section.

[edit]

Why does the 'controversies' section report on the initiation of two defamation suits, from 2011 and 2015, while not providing any information at all as to how the cases were concluded? Is the Indian legal process really that slow? 86.143.231.214 (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because of extreme political divide and The Caravan being a left (ideologically) magazine, the writers on Wikipedia generally avoid criticizing it. Also, the criminal defamation suits are on-going. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4056:195:38B:8038:F62D:B6EB:1346 (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the designation of the magazine as a left leaned one being edited out again and again without proper explaination? The founders, the authors, the articles, the advocacy are textbook left-wing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidit Bhosale (talkcontribs) 14:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vidit Bhosale, you need to provide reliable secondary sources which describe The Caravan as "left wing". We can not publish unverified assertions based on personal analyses. In addition, I've removed the "fact check" from The Times of India (RSP entry) which is not considered reliable on issues related to politics and the government. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]