Talk:The English Roses/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to review the English Roses article. --Auldhouse (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Auldhouse :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
This is a well-written article. I ran it through Grammarly and fixed a few minor copyediting issues. You might want to add a list to the Aftermath and sequels section with a list of the titles of the sequels. --Auldhouse (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Pass. Sources are verifiable and no plagarism issues. --Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article adheres to the template for {{NovelsWikiProject}} and provides not only a synopsis but information about the publication, literary significance, and reception.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article is fair and without bias.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
It would be great to add a photo of Madonna at an event for this book but may be hard to find.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Congratulations! This is a well-written, entertaining, and informative article. I remember all the hoopla when this book was first published. I was very pleased to read all of the behind-the-scenes information about the origins of the book. Keep writing!--Auldhouse (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Auldhouse :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 16:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]