Talk:The Holcad

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

Would a recent, unsolved theft controversy that garnered regional/national attention be enough for notability? I've been meaning to update this article for some time. Cdean 22:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A paper with such a long history might have some claim to notability due to past events which may not be available on-line, but as I have no access to any of these sources, and none are cited, I thought it worthy candidate for prod, to tease out what info others may have lurking. Don't know the specifics of controversy you may have in mind - I found nothing online per my search - any such controversy should of course comply with the requirements of WP:N. Ohconfucius 01:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll add it when I get a chance, perhaps later this week. I'm going to remove the prod, though, because I can't get to it before 18 April. Cdean 12:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck Ohconfucius 01:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I'm not convinced of this article's notability. I will give it a chance for additional citations.--Blargh29 (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]