Talk:The Infinite Game

clarification sought around why COI tag was removed

hi @AGTepper: I restored an edit you made removing the COI tags as it was unclear why it made sense to remove them yet. Can you please share your thinking? I ask the question in good faith. Thank you, WestportWiki (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is very notable work. It is both a New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestseller. This was published just 3 months ago, so still early days for it. After all very few people have time these days to read 251 pages, what with everyone publishing everything these days. i'll add couple of more citations.

Ronz put the COI back on 04 Dec 2019 speculating likely COI, i mean come on, it's like me putting coi on bloody bridgewater speculating you are getting paid 2 and 20 by the dalio/prince/jensen & co

Your good faith is extremely well placed, i can guarantee u of the same, i would never cheat on u : )

--AGTepper (talk) 02:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi @AGTepper: is that the same as saying you are going to integrate some citations? WestportWiki (talk) 04:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i've changed my mind, you are welcome to add more coi tags or delete the uncited verbiage or the entire article, it's the loss for the rest of the humanity if these ideas go unheard, i've tried my part, it's time to move on : ) --AGTepper (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would help here if Ronz, who added the {{COI}} tag, could explain why he added it. What's the evidence for COI issues here? Biogeographist (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ronz put the COI back on 04 Dec 2019 speculating likely COI, i mean come on, it's like me putting coi on silly 'start with why' speculating you are getting paid by our dear friend Sinek, haha --AGTepper (talk) 06:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with it being replaced with {{Advert}}. The same cleanup is needed, and the editor of interest hasn't edited since. --Ronz (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the editor of interest has changed his mind, you are welcome to add more advert tags or delete the uncited verbiage or the entire article, it's the loss for the rest of the humanity if these ideas go unheard, i've tried my part, it's time to move on : ) --AGTepper (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no 'criticism' section?

Surely there have been some reviews, some critique, some objections to this model by now. Why are they not shown? Fustbariclation (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fustbariclation: It's probably because nobody has found it worth their time to add it. It's just a stub article about a pop business book. If you have some time on your hands... Biogeographist (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]