Talk:The Nature of Alexander

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The hardcover edition is beautifully illustrated"? Doesn't sound very impartial to me, could someone who has read the book fix this please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.133.69.215 (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is, quite. Njál (talk) 22:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the illustrations are very beautiful. Anyone who denies this has no eye for beauty. Das Baz, aka Erudil 18:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this under summary? It's a negative review that belongs on something like Amazon