This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
The article states Shaw was absent from the group, while Charles Shaw (singer) states he was part of it. Dforest (talk) 01:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Is there any reason why a one-off group with almost the same name which can barely expand from its current state from lack of information isn't just a section in the main band article? It's really just a footnote in the band's history. FunkMonk (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those were actually the people they lip synced off of. As shady as it was, I’d say it would be a pretty good idea to merge the two. JTZegers (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merging this article with Milli Vanilli's is completely nonsense as they are two different groups/projects. Milli Vanilli ended in 1990 after the lip sync scandal and then The Real Milli Vanilli emerged. The articles should be separated, even though some of the same people are involved (the real singers) it's still a different group from the previous one. Different lineup, different name. The previous one got extinct. As The Real Milli Vanilli they dropped an album and some singles out of it and there's also some more information regarding this phase of the project that should be separated. Milli Vanilli info should stay in the Milli Vanilli article. The Real Milli Vanilli info can be referenced on the Milli Vanilli article but for detailed and complete info it should stay on The Real Milli Vanilli article page. Miguel098374 (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then merge it with the album article. The point is, the one-off group itself is not notable on its own. FunkMonk (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes merging it with the album article makes more sense considering that the info on The Real Milli Vanilli article and on their album's article is basically the same and most of it only refers to the album, so it's really the best thing to do. I agree! Miguel098374 (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
