Talk:The Succession to Muhammad

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2014. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Does anyone think this an article? It is not even a stub. --R. la Rue (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talk with GorgeCustersSabre

GorgeCustersSabre. You say I give excessive attention to one point. which is that? In my version there are three points from that author which I think are balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.125.41.217 (talk) 18:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC) @GorgeCustersSabre:[reply]

Dear friend 5.125.41.217, I do not believe your addition maintains a neutral point of view and I think it simply adds too much unnecessary information. I am open to being wrong on both views so perhaps we can wait until a third editor takes a stance. Hope this is fine. All good wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of the Middle East Librarians Association

Thanks for expanding the article, @AhmadLX. However, one of the cited reviews is not written by an expert. They are described as an "associate librarian" working at the University of Utah.[1] The lack of expertise makes it unreliable and it should not be cited next to experts. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 04:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiqi55: Admittedly, the journal name did make me pause for a while but from "University of Utah" I assumed she was a professor or something, and didn't bother to check further. She does have a Masters degree in Arabic according to the LinkedIn profile at least, but no higher qualification. Thanks for bringing this up. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]